We are becoming more and more aware of “value add” as both a marketing and sales component in the K12 education space. Teetering on so many other powerful constructs, concepts, and practices, “value add” will soon become pithy or trite resulting in little or no “value” to school and school system leaders let alone classroom practitioners.
Here’s why.
First - Defining “value add” is situational and requires context. First step is defining what you mean by “value add”. A new adage - "one person’s value add is another’s expected feature, function or deliverable”.
Second - Once defined, “value add” must be measurable. Value so often is in the eyes of the beholder. Therefore, it is imperative that you understand how value is to be measured as well as the metrics used to determine value.
If you haven’t thought this through you may find yourself in a conversation that is uncomfortable and undermines any trust capital you’ve built. Value intelligence underpins the context for defining “value add”. More on value intelligence later.
Value add goes both ways.
For over 12 years I served as a consulting superintendent working closely with over 100 different companies serving K12 education motivated through providing insights, input, and candid and at times brutally transparent feedback about the “value” of product and services intended to improve the quality of public education.
To be fair, companies would ask me “what would be a value add” that differentiated our product or service from competitors - a great question to ask Superintendents and one that caused me to step back and ponder.
At first I struggled. I found myself attempting to describe “good weather” only to realize, everyone has their own interpretation of “good” weather. I need more substance and a way to communicate value add. Finally, I came across a framework I have modified into a "value add model”. Here it is -
My “value add” model has seven (7) levers: Time, Technology, Team, Theory, Training, Tool, and Thought Leadership. Simply,
Time - the value add must use time efficiently and effectively
Technology - the value add must use technology efficiently and effectively
Team - the value add must incorporate teaming internally and externally with the solution provider - ongoing not “sell and done”
Theory - the value add must be based on grounded as well as evidenced base theory and proven results
Training - the value add must be 90% creating capacity, competence, and confidence in my staff and 10% on how to use the product or service.
Tool - the value add must be a “how” not a “what” with respect to a vehicle, path to expected results
Thought Leadership - the value add must provoke, guide, facilitate, and assist with helping our team and myself in “thinking” different about the work, to know different, and to do different
Each of the aforementioned is worthy of a deeper dive. Stay tuned - it’s coming.
Suffice it to say, I challenged companies to define and articulate how their “value add” demonstrated each of the seven “T”s.
More often or not, once unpacked, the perceived value add from the company’s perspective was not measurable. The absence of a means to measure is akin to the “emperor wearing no clothes”.
My challenge, therefore, to both companies as well as school and school system leaders is to define “value add”; and define the metrics and how “value add” will be measured.