Recently, we were visiting with friends discussing myriad events
as good friends do – current as well as past. I’ve always enjoyed listening to
diversity of opinion, thoughts, and comments as well as offering a few of my
own.
I shared I was in the middle of revisiting and writing about the
school effects research specifically related to the educational attainment of
those "in" and "at" risk. I’ve learned through experience
that poverty – rural poverty is one of the most egregious forms of poverty with
little or no relief or hope.
Risking offending some, it is very difficult to separate poverty
from race in our country. This is not an epiphany or revelation. Poverty
irrespective of geography creates lasting, generational cycles that are very
challenging to break. Education has proven a significant factor correlated with
breaking the bonds of poverty.
Even as a powerful and proven factor, much work remains.
What we have learned, however, is that a combination of powerful,
proven strategies, conviction, commitment, and courage can produced consistent,
constant, and long lasting impact.
From my perspective and based on experience, the school effects
research provides clear understanding and foundation for not only school and
school system leaders but for policy makers that are authentically and
sincerely committed to “learning for all”. I have made this a centerpiece in
each of the school systems I was honored and privileged to lead because I
believe in the behaviors not just the words.
I temper my passion about the utility and effect of the correlates
with this reality – “the learning for all mission is an inside out
proposition”. That is, you can't mandate or legislate this mission or force
from the outside in. If you could, we would not continue to fall short of our
aspirations, goals, and intentions to achieve universal proficiency of the most
basic of skill sets or knowledge sets. Inside out versus outside in – a lesson
we continue to fail to learn.
Previously, I have written about two of the seven factors or
correlates of effective schools – A Climate Of High Expectations for Success
and Clear and Focused Mission. The third factor, Safe and Orderly Environment,
is one that has significant meaning for me.
I believe that before schools and school systems can produce the
desired and expected educational outcomes that the learning environment must be
“free” of behaviors that impair, interfere, or contribute to an unsafe,
insecure place for learners as well as teachers. My belief is based on the
findings of the school effects research and the results of applying the
research in classrooms, schools, and school systems.
Schools and school systems that out perform their demographics
consistently and constantly have a safe and orderly environment. They are serious
about creating the conditions for teachers and learners to be successful. They
are committed to eradicating inappropriate behaviors as well as reinforcing and
affirming behaviors that build efficacy in students and adults alike.
The Safe and Orderly Environment correlate became more than theory
when I first learned and implemented Make Your Day (MYD). Going on 20 years of
using MYD, I refuse to “box” it in as a program. Rather, it has and will remain
a framework and process for creating and sustaining a safe and orderly
environment.
My training as a pre-service and early career educator was in
William Glasser’s “Control Theory” and Lee Canter’s “Assertive Discipline”
underpinned with a lot of behavioral modification and theory. What would become
clearer about my philosophy and practice of classroom management as well as
administering discipline as a high school assistant principal was that there
really was little or no consistency within and throughout a school with respect
to behavioral expectations let alone the consequence of any/all violations. I
count myself as guilty of the inconsistency. Then came MYD.
A proactive model and approach to “preventing” as best as possible
the types of behavior that create an unsafe environment for children as well as
adults. The framework and subsequent training has proven itself over and over
again as effective and efficient. A key word - accountability! More on this
next week.
The MYD framework answers the “how” question with respect to
creating and sustaining a safe and orderly environment. Admittedly, MYD works
when the adults are committed to modeling the very behaviors we expect and
require from students. It is not only eradicating the undesirable behaviors but
providing a process and expectations for the desired and expected behaviors of
a civil society albeit in school or in the community.
We allow and tolerate certain behaviors often dismissing the
antecedents of the more egregious acts. This is not a child or “kid” issue - it
is an adult issue. This is where I believe MYD becomes invaluable. MYD is a
comprehensive strategy for creating as well as sustaining a culture not just an
environment that is safe and orderly for all.
Safe and Orderly environment comes first. Adults cannot expect a
child – any child to learn when the environment is not safe as well as orderly.
Though my intent was not to spend time advocating for MYD, the proof is too
compelling.
For me, MYD provided the vehicle for a safe and orderly
environment that in turn was responsible for unprecedented teaching and
learning improvement and academic gains. It is worth serious consideration.
No comments:
Post a Comment